4.6 Article

Application of multivariate statistical techniques for investigating climate change and anthropogenic effects on surface water quality assessment: case study of Zohreh river, Hendijan, Iran

期刊

APPLIED WATER SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-021-01399-0

关键词

Surface water quality; Multivariate statistical techniques; Factor analysis; Cluster analysis; Zohreh river

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, spatial variations and water quality data of the Zohrehh River were evaluated using multivariate analytical techniques, with a focus on the impact of agricultural fertilizers on downstream stations near the ASK dam.
In the present study, evaluation of spatial variations and interpretation of Zohrehh River water quality data were made by using multivariate analytical techniques including factor analysis and cluster analysis also the Arc GIS (R) software was used. The research method was formulated to achieve objectives herein, including field observation, numerical modeling, and laboratory analyses. The results showed that dataset consisted of 11,250 observations of seven-year monitoring program (measurement of 15 variables at 3 main stations from April 2010 to March 2017). Factor analysis with principal component analysis extraction of the dataset yielded seven varactors contributing to 82% of total variance and evaluated the incidence of each varactor on the total variance. The results of cluster analysis became complete with t-test and made water quality comparison between two clusters possible. Results of factor analysis were employed to facilitate t-test analysis. The t-test revealed the significant difference in a confidence interval of 95% between the mean of calculated varactors 1, 2, 6 and 7 between two clusters, but there was no significant difference in the mean of other varactors 3, 4 and 5 between two groups. The result shows the effect of agricultural fertilizers on stations located at downstream of the ASK dam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据