4.7 Article

Hydrothermal Growth of ZnO Nanorods for Use in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 6212-6222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c01012

关键词

DSSCs; Gr:PEDOT; N-719; passivating layer; photoconversion efficiency; ZnO nanorods; TiO2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of hydrothermal growth time on the synthesis of zinc oxide nanorods was studied, and the optimal growth time was identified as 9 hours. The addition of a passivating layer of titanium dioxide significantly increased the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.
Zinc oxide nanorods were grown hydrothermally and used as a photoanodic material in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The influence of hydrothermal growth time on the synthesis of ZnO nanorods was expounded by various characterizations, viz., FESEM, EDXS, XRD, FTIR, XPS, and UV-visible spectroscopy. The FESEM imaging ascertained the rod-shape morphology of ZnO. The XRD and FTIR measurements confirmed the formation of the defect-free and crystalline hexagonal wurtzite ZnO nanorod-like structure. The XRD calculations also demonstrated the increase in lattice strain and thereby the length of ZnO nanorods as a result of an increase in the hydrothermal growth time. The purity and surface properties of ZnO nanorods were confirmed by EDXS and XPS. The UV-visible spectroscopy revealed an electronic transition in bandgap energy due to quantum confinement effect, resulting in a decrease in the bandgap energy. The consequences of reaction time were also observed on the photovoltaic parameters of the DSSCs. The DSSC fabricated with the 9-ZNR sample exhibited a maximum efficiency of 1.62%, and hence the optimal time for the growth of ZnO nanorods was confirmed as 9 h. A passivating layer of TiO2 on ZnO nanorods boosted the efficiency by almost 2-fold, which was ascribed to factors like a decrease in the interfacial charge recombination, a reduction in the dissolution of ZnO, and a reduction in interfacial traps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据