4.2 Article

Comparison of Copper-crosslinked Carboxymethyl Cellulose Versus Biopolymer-based Hydrogels for Controlled Release of Fertilizer

期刊

POLYMER-PLASTICS TECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS
卷 60, 期 17, 页码 1884-1897

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/25740881.2021.1934017

关键词

Biopolymers; carboxymethyl cellulose; Copper-crosslinked CMC; trimethyl chitosan; controlled release fertilizer; kinetic mechanism; nutrition values

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the hydrogel prepared from copper-crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose as a controlled release system of fertilizer, showing high swelling capacity and sustained release rate, with a Fickian or quasi-Fickian diffusion mechanism for fertilizer release. The performance of the hydrogel was reflected in the nutrition value of onion planted in gel-treated soil.
This work deals with evaluating the hydrogel prepared from copper-crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose as a controlled release system of fertilizer. In this respect, the behavior of gel was compared with gels prepared from polycationic biopolymer (trimethyl chitosan; Tri.M.Ch), individual or as a crosslinking agent of carboxylate-containing cellulose derivatives (CMC) and oxidized cellulose nanoparticles (OC.NPs). The swelling behavior of gel was preliminarily examined as a key factor for gel application. It is worth noting that the swelling capacity of CMC-Cu(II) gel was very higher (2350% at 250 min) than other gels (Tri.M.Ch, CMC-Tri.M.Ch and OC.NPs.Tri.M.Ch), where their swelling capacities ranged 100-300%. Moreover, it provided more sustained release rate of monoammonium phosphate (MAP-fertilizer) loaded hydrogels, similar to CMC-Tr.M.Ch, with maximum similar to 87-88%; while the gels of Tr.M.Ch. and Tr.M.Ch.-OC.NPs achieved maximum release reached 96-100%. The release of MAP from the hydrogels was followed by a Fickian or quasi-Fickian diffusion mechanism. The trend of hydrogels for MAP release was reflected in the nutrition value (NPK) of onion planted on gel-treated sand loamy soil. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据