4.0 Review

Writing a strong scientific paper in medicine and the biomedical sciences: a checklist and recommendations for early career researchers

期刊

BIOLOGIA FUTURA
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 395-407

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42977-021-00095-z

关键词

Scientific research; Publications; Medical publications; Clinical medicine; Peer review; Academic training; Abstracting and indexing

类别

资金

  1. University of Szeged
  2. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [BO/00144/20/5]
  3. New National Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Human Resources [UNKP-20-5-SZTE-330]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientific writing is a crucial skill for researchers, and the ability to write a strong scientific paper is necessary. Insufficient scientific writing skills may result in rejection of publication, impacting academic careers. This review aims to introduce the details of creating a strong original article for publication, especially for novice or early career researchers.
Scientific writing is an important skill in both academia and clinical practice. The skills for writing a strong scientific paper are necessary for researchers (comprising academic staff and health-care professionals). The process of a scientific research will be completed by reporting the obtained results in the form of a strong scholarly publication. Therefore, an insufficiency in scientific writing skills may lead to consequential rejections. This feature results in undesirable impact for their academic careers, promotions and credits. Although there are different types of papers, the original article is normally the outcome of experimental/epidemiological research. On the one hand, scientific writing is part of the curricula for many medical programs. On the other hand, not every physician may have adequate knowledge on formulating research results for publication adequately. Hence, the present review aimed to introduce the details of creating a strong original article for publication (especially for novice or early career researchers).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据