4.3 Article

Phase Formation, Microstructure and Permeability of Fe-Deficient Ni-Cu-Zn Ferrites, (I): Effect of Sintering Temperature

期刊

MAGNETOCHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/magnetochemistry7080118

关键词

soft ferrites; magnetic permeability; polycrystalline microstructure

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Germany) [To 165/9-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the effect of stoichiometry and Fe-deficiency on the properties of Ni-Cu-Zn ferrites, and observes phase formation, microstructure changes, and permeability variations under different sintering temperatures and compositions.
We have studied the densification, phase formation, microstructure, and permeability of stoichiometric and Fe-deficient Ni-Cu-Zn ferrites of composition Ni0.30Cu0.20Zn0.50+zFe2-zO4-(z/2) with 0 <= z <= 0.06 sintered at temperatures from 900 degrees C to 1150 degrees C. The shrinkage is shifted from 1000 degrees C for z = 0 towards lower temperatures and reaches its maximum rate at 900 degrees C for z = 0.02. Stoichiometric ferrites show regular growth of single-phase ferrite grains if sintered at T-s <= 1100 degrees C. Sintering at 1150 degrees C leads to the formation of a small amount of Cu2O, triggering exaggerated grain growth. Fe-deficient compositions (z > 0) form Cu-poor stoichiometric ferrites coexisting with a minority CuO phase after sintering at 900-1000 degrees C. At T-s >= 1050 degrees C, CuO transforms into Cu2O, and exaggerated grain growth is observed. The formation of Cu oxide second phases is investigated using XRD, SEM, and EDX. The permeability of the ferrites increases with sintering temperature up to a maximum permeability of mu = 230 for z = 0 or mu = 580 for z = 0.02, respectively, at T-s = 1000 degrees C. At higher sintering temperatures, the permeability decreases, which is due to the formation of a microstructure with intra-crystalline porosity in large grains, and a non-magnetic Cu oxide grain boundary phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据