4.7 Article

Milling and Baking Quality of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from Organic Farming

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11080765

关键词

spring wheat; organic agriculture; Fusarium spp.; mycotoxin; quality of grain; flour yield; technological value

类别

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development [HORre-msz-078-23/16(243)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the infestation level of Fusarium spp. and mycotoxin content in spring wheat grains from organic agriculture, as well as their technological value for milling and baking processing. Results showed that most tested varieties met the requirements for food safety and processing, with Arabella being the most recommended variety for organic production.
The quality of grain products from organic agriculture is an important subject of research for food safety and consumer health. The aim of the study was to examine the grain of spring wheat from organic agriculture according to their infestation by Fusarium spp., mycotoxin content, and technological value for milling and baking processing. The material was grain of 13 spring wheat varieties cultivated in organic systems in 3 years. The results showed that the intensity of Fusarium head blight (FHB) was low and ranged from 0.0% to 5.5% of ears. Grain infestation by Fusarium spp. varied between varieties and years from 1.5% to 18.5%. The colonization of grains by Fusarium spp. did not reflect the intensity of FHB. The lowest grain infestation by Fusarium spp. was noted for the varieties: Waluta, Zadra, and Arabella. Mycotoxin contamination of the grain of tested varieties did not exceed accepted standards. The requirements of the milling and baking industries were generally met by grain and flour of all the tested varieties. On the basis of the 3 year study results related to food safety and processing properties, the varieties most useful for organic production are Arabella, followed by Brawura, Izera, Kandela, Katoda, KWS Torridon, Waluta, and Zadra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据