4.6 Review

Mercury Export From Freshwater to Estuary: Carbocentric Science Elucidates the Fate of a Toxic Compound in Aquatic Boreal Environments

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.697563

关键词

mercury; organic matter; DOC; river continuum; reservoir; estuary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the importance of mercury chemistry in freshwater systems, particularly the high toxicity of the organic form methylmercury. The fate of different forms of mercury along the river-estuary continuum, as well as the challenges in integrating various parameters and technical difficulties in sampling and analyzing mercury, hinder advances in the field. Meanwhile, the significant growth of carbocentric science in the past 25 years has shed light on the common fate of carbon and mercury in freshwater environments.
The chemistry of mercury in freshwater systems, particularly man-made reservoirs, has received a great deal of attention owing to the high toxicity of the most common organic form, methylmercury. Although methylmercury bioaccumulation in reservoirs and natural lakes has been extensively studied at all latitudes, the fate of the different forms of mercury (total vs. dissolved; organic vs. inorganic) along the entire river-estuary continuum is less well documented. In fact, the difficulty of integrating the numerous parameters involved in mercury speciation in such large study areas, combined with the technical difficulties in sampling and analyzing mercury, have undoubtedly hindered advances in the field. At the same time, carbocentric science has grown exponentially in the last 25 years, and the common fate of carbon and mercury in freshwater has become increasingly clear with time. This literature review, by presenting the knowledge acquired in these two fields, aims to better understand the extent of mercury export from boreal inland waters to estuaries and to investigate the possible downstream ecotoxicological impact of reservoir creation on mercury bioavailability to estuarine food webs and local communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据