4.6 Article

Bone-Marrow Stem Cells and Acellular Human Amniotic Membrane in a Rat Model of Heart Failure

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11090958

关键词

myocardial infarction; tissue regeneration; stem cells; human amniotic membrane

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ) [405670/2018-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that cell-based therapies using bone marrow stem cells and human amniotic membrane can effectively improve ventricular function and volume in heart failure rat models after myocardial infarction, increasing angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte expression.
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains the leading cause of cardiovascular death worldwide and a major cause of heart failure. Recent studies have suggested that cell-based therapies with bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) and human amniotic membrane (hAM) would recover the ventricular function after MI; however, the mechanisms underlying these effects are still controversial. Herein, we aimed to compare the effects of BMSC and hAM in a rat model of heart failure. MI was induced through coronary occlusion, and animals with an ejection fraction (EF) < 50% were included and randomized into three groups: control, BMSC, and hAM. The BMSC and hAM groups were implanted on the anterior ventricular wall seven days after MI, and a new echocardiographic analysis was performed on the 30th day, followed by euthanasia. The echocardiographic results after 30 days showed significant improvements on EF and left-ventricular end-sistolic and end-diastolic volumes in both BMSC and hAM groups, without significant benefits in the control group. New blood vessels, desmine-positive cells and connexin-43 expression were also elevated in both BMSC and hAM groups. These results suggest a recovery of global cardiac function with the therapeutic use of both BMSC and hAM, associated with angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte regeneration after 30 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据