4.6 Article

Recombinase-Aided Amplification Coupled with Lateral Flow Dipstick for Efficient and Accurate Detection of Porcine Parvovirus

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11080762

关键词

porcine parvovirus; recombinase-aided amplification; lateral flow dipstick

资金

  1. Key Research Projects of Universities in Guangdong Province [2019KZDXM026]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201803020005]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, China [2019B020211003]
  4. Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research [2020B0301030007]
  5. 111 Project [D20008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine parvovirus (PPV) infection is a major concern in the swine industry globally, and it is crucial to establish a rapid and efficient detection method. A new recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) assay was developed in this study, which showed high specificity for PPV detection, increased sensitivity compared to PCR, and cost-saving benefits.
Porcine parvovirus (PPV) infection is the primary cause of SMEDI (stillbirth; mummification; embryonic death; infertility) syndrome, which is a global burden for the swine industry. Thus, it is crucial to establish a rapid and efficient detection method against PPV infection. In the present work, we developed a recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) assay, coupled with a lateral flow dipstick (LFD), to achieve an amplification of PPV DNA at 37 degrees C within 15 min. The detection limits of PPV RAA-LFD assay were 10(2) copies/mu L recombinant plasmid pMD19-T-VP1, 6.38 x 10(-7) ng/mu L PPV DNA, and 10(-1) TCID50/mL virus, respectively. This method was highly specific for PPV detection with no cross-reactivity for other swine pathogens. In contrast to polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the PPV RAA-LFD assay is more sensitive and cost-saving. Hence, the established PPV RAA-LFD assay provided an alternative for PPV detection, especially in resource-limited regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据