4.6 Article

Entamoeba histolytica Trophozoites Interact with the c-Met Receptor at the Surface of Liver Origin Cells through the Gal/GalNAc Amoebic Lectin

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11090923

关键词

Gal; GalNAc lectin; Entamoeba histolytica cytotoxicity; c-Met receptor

资金

  1. UNAM-PAPIIT [IN 216720, IN 216217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amoebiasis in humans is caused by the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, which interacts with the c-Met receptor on the surface of HepG2 cells through its Gal/GalNAc lectin, leading to cytotoxic effects.
Amoebiasis in humans is caused by the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, which cytotoxic activity has been demonstrated on a wide variety of target cells. The process involves the adherence of the parasite to the cell, and such adherence is mediated by an amoebic surface lectin, known as Gal/GalNAc lectin. It is composed of heavy, intermediate, and light subunits. The carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) has been identified within a cysteine-rich region in the lectin heavy subunit and has an amino acid sequence identity to the receptor-binding domain of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Recombinant CRD has been previously shown to compete with HGF for binding to the c-Met receptor IgG fusion protein. In the present study, we searched for evidence of interaction between the Gal/GalNAc lectin at the surface of trophozoites with the c-Met receptor expressed at the surface of HepG2 in coculture assays. Immunoprecipitation of the coculture lysate indicated interaction of the c-Met with a 60 kDa peptide recognized by antiamoebic lectin antibody. Colocalization of both molecules was detected by fluorescence confocal microscopy. Incubation of HepG2 cells with HGF before coculture with trophozoites prevents the cytotoxic effect caused by the parasites but not their adherence to the cells. Our results point to Gal/GalNAc lectin as a ligand of the c-Met receptor at the surface of HepG2 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据