4.6 Article

Classification of high-voltage power line structures in low density ALS data acquired over broad non-urban areas

期刊

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.672

关键词

LiDAR; Powerlines; Segmentation; Transmission towers; Classification; Forest

资金

  1. Ministere des Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs du Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an algorithm for segmenting and cleaning electrical network facilities in ALS point clouds, achieving an accuracy of 98.6%. The method, based on two priors, was tested on a network of 200 km and aims to enhance the automated detection capacity of power line structures.
Airborne laser scanning (ALS) has gained importance over recent decades for multiple uses related to the cartography of landscapes. Processing ALS data over large areas for forest resource estimation and ecological assessments requires efficient algorithms to filter out some points from the raw data and remove human-made structures that would otherwise be mistaken for natural objects. In this paper, we describe an algorithm developed for the segmentation and cleaning of electrical network facilities in low density (2.5 to 13 points/m(2)) ALS point clouds. The algorithm was designed to identify transmission towers, conductor wires and earth wires from high-voltage power lines in natural landscapes. The method is based on two priors i.e. (1) the availability of a map of the high-voltage power lines across the area of interest and (2) knowledge of the type of transmission towers that hold the conductors along a given power line. It was tested on a network totalling 200 km of wires supported by 415 transmission towers with diverse topographies and topologies with an accuracy of 98.6%. This work will help further the automated detection capacity of power line structures, which had previously been limited to high density point clouds in small, urbanised areas. The method is open-source and available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据