4.5 Article

Influence of Membrane Vibration on Particles Rejection Using a Slotted Pore Membrane Microfiltration

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11090709

关键词

membrane oscillation; shear rate; slotted structure membrane; oil water separation; membrane fouling

资金

  1. European Space Agency (MAP EVAPORATIOON project)
  2. Marie Curie NanoPaint Project, European Science Foundation
  3. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method using membrane oscillation and slotted pores in microfiltration membranes was proposed to increase rejection and reduce fouling. Experimental results in oil water separation showed a significant reduction in oil droplet concentration in the permeate, indicating the effectiveness of membrane oscillation.
A new method is proposed to increase the rejection in microfiltration by applying membrane oscillation, using a new type of microfiltration membrane with slotted pores. The oscillations applied to the membrane surface result in reduced membrane fouling and increased separation efficiency. An exact mathematical solution of the flow in the surrounding solution outside the oscillating membrane is developed. The oscillation results in the appearance of a lift velocity, which moves oil particles away from the membrane. The latter results in both reduced membrane fouling and increased oil droplet rejection. This developed model was supported by the experimental results for oil water separation in the produced water treatment. It was proven that the oil droplet concentration was reduced notably in the permeate, due to the membrane oscillation, and that the applied shear rate caused by the membrane oscillation also reduced pore blockage. A four-times lower oil concentration was recorded in the permeate when the membrane vibration frequency was 25 Hz, compared to without membrane vibration. Newly generated microfiltration membranes with slotted pores were used in the experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据