4.7 Article

Highly Sensitive Colorimetric Assay of Cortisol Using Cortisol Antibody and Aptamer Sandwich Assay

期刊

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios11050163

关键词

cortisol; c-Mab; c-SBA; antibody aptamer sandwich; colorimetric assay

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2020R1F1A1073708]
  2. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through its Ecological Imitation-based Environmental Pollution Management Technology Development Project, by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2019002790002]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1073708] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the sensitive detection of cortisol using the sandwich assay of cortisol monoclonal antibody and cortisol specific binding aptamer, with a very low detection limit. The use of gold nanoparticles stacking enables highly sensitive colorimetric detection of cortisol on an optically transparent substrate.
In this study, cortisol, which is a key stress hormone, could be detected sensitively via the colorimetric assay of a polycarbonate (PC) and glass substrate by the sandwich assay of cortisol monoclonal antibody (c-Mab) and cortisol specific binding aptamer (c-SBA). A highly sensitive change in colorimetry with a limit of detection (LOD) of cortisol of 100 fM could be attained on the optically transparent substrate using the antibody aptamer sandwich (AAS) assay by corresponding stacks of 5 nm gold nanoparticles (Au NPs). The Au NPs were conjugated by the c-SBA and the c-Mab was tethered on the PC and glass substrates. For the AAS method, a simple UV-Vis spectrophotometer was adopted to quantify the cortisol concentrations at an absorbance wavelength of 520 nm. Therefore, this study demonstrates the versatility of the AAS method to measure very low concentrations of cortisol in diagnostic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据