4.7 Review

Biomedical Applications of Electromagnetic Detection: A Brief Review

期刊

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios11070225

关键词

electromagnetic detection and biosensors; electromagnetic biological theory; biomedical application; frequency; machine learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of the China Youth Fund Project [61901022]
  2. Fundamental Scientific Research Business Fees of the Central Universities-Top-notch Young Talents Program [YWF-19-BJ-J-358]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a review of the recent biomedical applications of electromagnetic detection, including the effects and mechanisms of electromagnetic fields on organisms, the parameters influencing electromagnetic biological effects, and the use of machine learning in clinical diagnosis. Future development in electromagnetic detection for biomedical applications is focused on further integration and innovation in the field.
This paper presents a review on the biomedical applications of electromagnetic detection in recent years. First of all, the thermal, non-thermal, and cumulative thermal effects of electromagnetic field on organism and their biological mechanisms are introduced. According to the electromagnetic biological theory, the main parameters affecting electromagnetic biological effects are frequency and intensity. This review subsequently makes a brief review about the related biomedical application of electromagnetic detection and biosensors using frequency as a clue, such as health monitoring, food preservation, and disease treatment. In addition, electromagnetic detection in combination with machine learning (ML) technology has been used in clinical diagnosis because of its powerful feature extraction capabilities. Therefore, the relevant research involving the application of ML technology to electromagnetic medical images are summarized. Finally, the future development to electromagnetic detection for biomedical applications are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据