4.6 Article

Validity and Reliability of a Water Frequency Questionnaire to Estimate Daily Total Water Intake in Adults

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.676697

关键词

dietary assessment; hydration; nutrition methodology; self-report; underhydration; water

资金

  1. Danone Research [30000273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a seven-day water frequency questionnaire (TWI-FQ) in estimating daily total water intake (TWI) compared to a water turnover reference value. The questionnaire significantly underestimated TWI compared to the reference value, but showed moderate reliability in sample-level assessment.
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a seven-day water frequency questionnaire (TWI-FQ) to estimate daily total water intake (TWI) in comparison to a water turnover objective reference value via deuterium oxide (D2O). Data collection occurred over 3 weeks, with a wash-out period during week two. Healthy adults (n = 98; 52% female; 41 +/- 14 y; BMI, 26.4 +/- 5.5 kg center dot m(-2)) retrospectively self-reported consumption frequencies of 17 liquids and 35 foods with specified volumes/amounts for weeks one and three via TWI-FQ. Standard water content values were utilized to determine the volume of water consumed from each liquid and food for calculation of mean daily TWI for each week. Diet records were completed daily during week two to estimate metabolic water production. To assess validity of the TWI-FQ, participants consumed D2O at the start of each week and provided urine samples immediately before ingestion, the following day, and at the end of the week to calculate water turnover. Metabolic water was subtracted from water turnover to estimate TWI. TWI-FQ validity was assessed via Bland-Altman plot for multiple observations. Reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation and Pearson's correlation between weeks. TWI-FQ significantly underestimated D2O TWI by -350 +/- 1,431 mL center dot d(-1) (95% confidence interval (CI): -551, -149 mL center dot d(-1)). TWI-FQ TWI was significantly correlated (r = 0.707, P <0.01) and not different (198 +/- 1,180 mL center dot d(-1), 95% CI: -38, 435 mL center dot d(-1)) between weeks. TWI-FQ intraclass correlation = 0.706 was significant [95% CI: 0.591, 0.793; F-(97,F- 98) = 5.799], indicating moderate test-retest reliability. While this tool would not be suitable for individual TWI assessment, the magnitude of bias may be acceptable for assessment at the sample-level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据