4.8 Article

Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 13, 页码 3835-3843

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6gc00687f

关键词

-

资金

  1. USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) Competitive Grant, Guangzhou Elite Project of China [2011-67009-20056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we report the production of highly thermal stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and nanofibrils (CNF) by hydrolysis using concentrated organic acids. Due to their low water solubility, these solid organic acids can be easily recovered after hydrolysis reactions through crystallization at a lower or ambient temperature. When dicarboxylic acids were used, the resultant CNC surface contained carboxylic acid groups which facilitate functionalization and dispersion in aqueous processing. The carboxylic acid group content was 0.1-0.4 mmol g(-1) for CNC produced from a bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp (BEP) using oxalic acid at concentrations of 50-70 wt%. The onset thermal degradation temperature for the CNC was increased to 322 degrees C from 274 degrees C for the feed BEP fibers, compared with 218 degrees C for CNC produced from the same feed fibers using conventional concentrated sulfuric acid hydrolysis. The low strength (high pK(a)) of organic acids also resulted in CNC with longer lengths of approximately 275-380 nm and higher crystallinity than those produced using mineral acids. Fibrous cellulosic solid residue (FCSR) collected from acid hydrolysis was an excellent feedstock for producing CNF through subsequent mechanical fibrillation with low energy input. The ability to recover organic acids using a conventional and commercially proven crystallization method makes these organic acids uniquely suitable for sustainable and green production of cellulose nanomaterials. The resultant CNC and CNF with high thermal stability and a large aspect ratio are excellent for bio-composite applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据