4.7 Article

Automatic design system for generating routing layout of tubes, hoses, and cable harnesses in a commercial truck

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwab034

关键词

automatic design system; commercial truck; Dijkstra's algorithm; genetic algorithm; routing layout design; routing algorithm

资金

  1. Hyundai Motor Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a systematic framework for generating the routing layout design in a commercial truck, including various methods such as routing algorithms and genetic algorithms. The research shows that the proposed algorithm provides a better routing layout design than traditional ones.
Although many routing algorithms have been developed, it is difficult for designers in the automotive industry to adopt them because of the complicated preliminary steps that are required. This study presents a systematic framework for generating the routing layout of the tubes, hoses, and cable harnesses in a commercial truck. The routing layout design problem in a commercial truck is analysed and defined. For routing operations, a sequential graph-based routing algorithm is employed to rapidly provide a routing solution. Because a reference routing layout design does not exist in most engineering problems, a cell-based genetic algorithm combined with a modified maze algorithm is employed to generate a reference design. To consider the clamping condition of the routing components, a new fitness function in the genetic algorithm is implemented. The numerical study shows that the proposed routing algorithm provides a better reference routing layout design than the conventional algorithm. The proposed automatic design system was applied to the routing layout design problem of a commercial truck. It was demonstrated that the proposed framework satisfies all industrial practitioners' functional requirements and provides a systematic method of solving the routing layout design problem, considering all its characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据