4.6 Article

Cascaded Filtering Using the Sigma Point Transformation

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 4758-4765

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3068694

关键词

State estimation; Random variables; Covariance matrices; Task analysis; Noise measurement; Kalman filters; Estimation error; Sensor fusion; distributed robot systems

类别

资金

  1. FRQNT [2018-PR-253646]
  2. William Dawson Scholar Program
  3. NSERC
  4. CFI JELF Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel cascaded and decentralized filtering approach that approximates cross-covariances when local estimators consider distinct state vectors. The proposed estimator is validated in simulations and experiments on a three-dimensional attitude and position estimation problem, showing superior performance compared to other filtering approaches.
It is often convenient to separate a state estimation task into smaller local tasks, where each local estimator estimates a subset of the overall system state. However, neglecting cross-covariance terms between state estimates can result in overconfident estimates, which can ultimately degrade the accuracy of the estimator. Common cascaded filtering techniques focus on the problem of modelling cross-covariances when the local estimators share a common state vector. This letter introduces a novel cascaded and decentralized filtering approach that approximates the cross-covariances when the local estimators consider distinct state vectors. The proposed estimator is validated in simulations and in experiments on a three-dimensional attitude and position estimation problem. The proposed approach is compared to a naive cascaded filtering approach that neglects cross-covariance terms, a sigma point-based Covariance Intersection filter, and a full-state filter. In both simulations and experiments, the proposed filter outperforms the naive and the Covariance Intersection filters, while performing comparatively to the full-state filter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据