4.7 Article

Determinants of Carbon Emission in China: How Good is Green Investment?

期刊

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 392-401

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.008

关键词

carbon emissions; energy investment; financial development; green investment; natural resources rent; People's Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid industrialization and modernization of China's economy have worsened climate change caused by carbon emissions. Green investments can reduce carbon emissions, while natural resource extraction, financial sector development, and energy investments tend to increase carbon emissions. Bidirectional causation is observed between carbon emissions and other macroeconomic aggregates considered in the study.
The rapid industrialization and modernization of the People's Republic of China's economy have significantly aggravated the nation's carbon emission-induced climate change adversities. Under this premise, this study attempts to analyze the roles of green investments and other key macroeconomic aggregates in reducing carbon emissions in 30 provinces in China from 1995 to 2017. The robust econometric tools efficient in handling cross-sectional dependency and slope heterogeneity issues were utilized. The Westerlund cointegration analysis confirms the long-term association between the variables of concern. Moreover, the elasticity estimates from the cross-section augmented autoregressive distributed a lag approach indicate that investments in green projects are seen to reduce short- and long-term carbon emission levels. In contrast, the extraction of natural resources, the development of the financial sector, and energy investments increase carbon emissions, both in the short and long term. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality analysis indicate bidirectional causation amongst carbon emissions and the other macroeconomic aggregates considered in this study. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据