4.7 Review

Review of the Use of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Tools

期刊

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 425-435

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.012

关键词

Corporate Social Responsibility tools; Frameworks; Standards; Ratings and indices, GRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed the use of CSR reporting tools based on their classifications, highlighting the significance and issues associated with the GRI tool in practice, as well as exploring potential uses of the tool within organizations.
There are an increasing number of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting tools that are evolving. As a result, it has become chaotic and complicated for practitioners to select the most appropriate one for CSR reporting. To address the problem, previous studies have classified the CSR reporting tools into frameworks, standards and, ratings and indices classes for easy comprehension and application in practice. However, no study has focused on revealing the use of CSR reporting tools based on this classification. This study employed researchers' perspectives through a systematic review of journal papers published between 2001-2016 to reveal the use of CSR reporting tools based on their classifications. The findings revealed that the GRI tool in the framework class is widely implemented, but also associated with many problems that impact CSR reporting in practice. Also, there are new aspects where the tool could be used are for CSR learning in organisations and CSR regulation. Furthermore, the CSR reporting tools in the standards, ratings and indices classes are not commonly implemented for CSR reporting thereby attracting less researcher interest. The study concluded by linking the research and practice of the use of CSR reporting tools in different classes. The study has implications for CSR reporters who use CSR reporting tools in the frameworks, standards, and ratings and indices classes. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据