4.6 Article

Left Ventricular Global Function Index and the Impact of its Companion Metric

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695883

关键词

global function index; ratio-based metric; ejection fraction; stroke volume; end-systolic volume; left ventricular mass; ratiology; ventriculo-arterial coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Left ventricular global function index (LVGFI) is a volume-based composite metric for evaluating ventricular function, with serious limitations that require evaluation at both mathematical and clinical levels. LVGFI is mathematically coupled to both ejection fraction (EF) and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), sharing similar prognostic values and shortcomings. Sex-specific differences were observed in companion metrics, indicating incremental value compared to single-use metrics in characterizing patient groups.
Left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) has been introduced as a volume-based composite metric for evaluation of ventricular function. The definition formula combines stroke volume (SV), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV mass/density. Being a dimensionless ratio, this new metric has serious limitations which require evaluation at a mathematical and clinical level. Using CMRI in 96 patients we studied LV volumes, various derived metrics and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in order to further characterize LVGFI in three diagnostic groups: acute myocarditis, takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute myocardial infarction. We also considered the LVGFI companion (C), derived from the quadratic mean. Additional metrics such as ejection fraction (EF), myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), along with their companions (MCFC and VACC) were calculated. All companion metrics (EFC, LVGFIC, MCFC, and VACC) showed sex-specific differences, not clearly reflected by the corresponding ratio-based metrics. LVGFI is mathematically coupled to both EF (with R = 0.86) and VAC (R = 0.87), which observation clarifies why these metrics not only share similar prognostic values but also identical shortcomings. We found that the newly introduced LVGFIC has incremental value compared to the single use of LVGFI, EF, or GLS, when characterizing the three patient groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据