4.6 Article

The Non-linear Relationship Between Normal Range Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular or All-Cause Mortality Among Elderly Population

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.677189

关键词

normal blood pressure; systolic blood pressure; elderly population; cardiovascular mortality; all-cause mortality

资金

  1. China International Medical Foundation-China Cardiovascular Disease Development Special Fund-Heart Health Research Fund [Z-2019-42-1908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed a nonlinear association between normal range SBP levels and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in older adults without hypertension.
Purpose: The aim was to explore the association of normal range SBP with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in older adults without hypertension. Methods: Participants aged >= 65 years without hypertension and those had an SBP level between 90 and 129 mmHg were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2014). SBP was categorized into: 90-99, 100-109, 110-119, and 120-129 mmHg. Multivariate Cox regression was performed with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Of the 1,074 participants, 584 were men (54.38%). Compared with participants with SBP level ranged 110 to 119 mmHg, the HRs for all-cause mortality risk was 1.83 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.23) for SBP level ranged 90 to 99 mm Hg, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.54, 1.41) for SBP level ranged 100 to 109 mmHg, and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.75) for SBP level ranged 120 to 129 mmHg (P for trend = 0.448), and the HR for cardiovascular mortality risk was 3.30 (95% CI: 0.87, 12.54) for SBP level ranged 90 to 99 mmHg, 0.35(95% CI: 0.08, 1.56) for SBP level ranged 100 to 109 mmHg, and 1.75 (95% CI: 0.78, 3.94) for SBP level ranged 120 to 129 mm Hg (P for trend = 0.349) after confounders were adjusted. Conclusion: These were a nonlinear association of normal range SBP level with all-cause and cardiovascular death in older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据