4.7 Article

Numerical performance of thermal conductivity in Bioconvection flow of cross nanofluid containing swimming microorganisms over a cylinder with melting phenomenon

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101181

关键词

Cross nanofluid; Cylinder geometry; Non-linear thermal radiation; Shooting scheme; Bvp4c; Bioconvection; Motile microorganism

资金

  1. King Khalid University [R.G.P.2/138/42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of melting phenomena and non-linear thermal radiation in Cross nanofluid bioconvection flow with motile microorganisms over a cylinder. The mathematical model takes into account Brownian motion and thermophoresis diffusion. Numerical solutions and profiles analysis show that increasing mixed convection parameter estimates can enhance velocity, while increasing Prandtl number decreases temperature and nanoparticle concentration. A higher Peclet value is shown to lower the microorganism's profile.
This study investigates the effects of melting phenomena and non-linear thermal radiation in Cross nanofluid bioconvection flow with motile microorganisms with a convective boundary over a cylinder. Brownian motion and thermophoresis diffusion are also taken into account in this mathematical model. A governing partial differential equation is used to represent the given flow phenomena. The proper dimensionless transformation is then employed to convert the PDE controlling system into an ordinary one. Bvp4c numerically solves redesigned ODE problems using a shooting strategy in the computational tool MATLAB. Figures versus velocity, temperature distribution, nanoparticle concentration, and microbe concentration profiles are used to analyze and expound on the notably involved aspects thoroughly. It has been demonstrated that increasing the estimates of a mixed convection parameter can enhance velocity. By increasing the Prandtl number, the temperature and concentration of nanoparticles decrease. A high Peclet value lowers the microorganism's profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据