4.8 Article

Waterborne polyurethanes from CO2 based polyols with comprehensive hydrolysis/oxidation resistance

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 524-530

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5gc01373a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51321062, 21134002]
  2. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program [20150203002GX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide based oligo(carbonate-ether) diols (CO2-polyols) with both carbonate units and ether units in one polymer chain were prepared by copolymerization of CO2 and propylene oxide (PO) using a zinc-cobalt double metal complex as the catalyst, and used to prepare CO2 based waterborne polyurethanes (CO2-WPUs). The carbonate units in CO2-polyols improved the mechanical and oxidation resistance properties of CO2-WPUs, while the ether units in CO2-polyols enhanced the hydrolysis resistance of CO2-WPUs. The tensile strength of CO2-WPUs didn't show any obvious drop during immersion in a 0.25% sodium hydroxide solution, whereas that of oligoesterol based WPUs dropped over 50% after 300 min, and lost their mechanical properties after 520 min of immersion. Meanwhile, the retention of the tensile strength of the CO2-WPUs was ca. 72% even after 46 h of immersion in a 6 wt% H2O2 solution, while it was only ca. 32% for the oligoetherol based WPUs. Moreover, the thermal-mechanical performance of CO2-WPU films can be conveniently improved by adjusting the carbonate unit content (CU%) in CO2-polyols, i.e. when CU% in CO2-polyol increased from 30% to 66%, the glass transition temperature (Tg) increased from -7.8 degrees C to 18.8 degrees C, accompanied by an increase of tensile strength from 35.6 MPa to 52.2 MPa, and a decrease of elongation at break from 630% to 410%. This work suggests that the CO2-WPU may be a promising alternative to conventional WPU whose oligoetherol and oligoesterol were from fossil resources, and its comprehensive hydrolysis/oxidation resistance may be a bonus unavailable from common oligomerol based WPUs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据