4.7 Article

Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya

期刊

BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004937

关键词

child health; hospital-based study; paediatrics; public health

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1131320]
  2. Wellcome Trust Strategic Award [096527]
  3. Wellcome Trust [107769/Z/10/Z]
  4. MRC Newton Fund Collaborative Award [200344/Z/15/Z]
  5. Developing Excellents in Leadership Training in Science (DELTAS) Africa Initiative [DEL-15-003]
  6. African Academy of Sciences (AAS)'s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa
  7. New Partnership for Africa's Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency)
  8. UK government
  9. Wellcome Trust [200344/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  10. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1131320] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Health research in low-resource settings often involves vulnerable populations. Research teams should support frontline staff in identifying and addressing ethical dilemmas through regular cross-team ethics reflection sessions. Initiatives to support staff in dealing with ethical issues should complement existing institutional ethics review and health and safety policies.
Health research in low-resource settings often involves individuals and populations defined as 'vulnerable'. There is growing attention in the literature to the ethical dilemmas that frontline research staff face while conducting such research. However, there is little documented as to how research staff might support one another in identifying and handling these dilemmas in different contexts. Over the course of conducting empirical ethics research embedded in the Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition Network, we developed an approach to examine and respond to the ethical issues and dilemmas faced by the study teams, particularly frontline staff. In this paper we describe the specific tools and approach we developed, which centred on regular cross-team ethics reflection sessions, and share lessons learnt. We suggest that all studies involving potentially vulnerable participants should incorporate activities and processes to support frontline staff in identifying, reflecting on and responding to ethical dilemmas, throughout studies. We outline the resources needed to do this and share piloted tools for further adaptation and evaluation. Such initiatives should complement and feed into-and certainly not in any way replace or substitute for-strong institutional ethics review, safeguarding and health and safety policies and processes, as well broader staff training and career support initiatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据