4.6 Article

Privileged Quinolylnitrones for the Combined Therapy of Ischemic Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph14090861

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; ischemic stroke; multipotent drugs; neuroprotection; quinolylnitrones

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [IFI18/00011]
  2. European Development Regional Fund (FEDER) [PI18/00255, RETICS RD16/0019/0006]
  3. Programa Miguel Servet [CPII19/00005, PI19/00082]
  4. MINECO (Government of Spain) [SAF-2015-65586-R]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the relationship between cerebrovascular diseases and dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease, highlighting the importance of developing new dual therapeutic agents. A new small quinolylnitrone, MC903, is proposed as a potential dual therapy for stroke and Alzheimer's disease.
Cerebrovascular diseases such as ischemic stroke are known to exacerbate dementia caused by neurodegenerative pathologies such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Besides, the increasing number of patients surviving stroke makes it necessary to treat the co-occurrence of these two diseases with a single and combined therapy. For the development of new dual therapeutic agents, eight hybrid quinolylnitrones have been designed and synthesized by the juxtaposition of selected pharmacophores from our most advanced lead-compounds for ischemic stroke and AD treatment. Biological analyses looking for efficient neuroprotective effects in suitable phenotypic assays led us to identify MC903 as a new small quinolylnitrone for the potential dual therapy of stroke and AD, showing strong neuroprotection on (i) primary cortical neurons under oxygen-glucose deprivation/normoglycemic reoxygenation as an experimental ischemia model; (ii), neuronal line cells treated with rotenone/oligomycin A, okadaic acid or beta-amyloid peptide A beta(25-35), modeling toxic insults found among the effects of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据