4.7 Review

Dexamethasone in the Treatment of COVID-19: Primus Inter Pares?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060556

关键词

dexamethasone; corticosteroids; COVID-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COVID-19 severity and clinical outcomes are associated with dysregulated antiviral immunity and enhanced systemic inflammation. Corticosteroids like dexamethasone are used to reduce lung inflammation and inflammation-induced lung injury, with wide anti-inflammatory action. However, the optimal timing, dosing, and duration of corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19 patients remain uncertain.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has rapidly spread globally, becoming a huge public health challenge. Even though the vast majority of patients are asymptomatic, some patients present with pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, and death. It has been shown in several studies that the severity and clinical outcomes are related to dysregulated antiviral immunity and enhanced and persistent systemic inflammation. Corticosteroids have been used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, as they are reported to elicit benefits by reducing lung inflammation and inflammation-induced lung injury. Dexamethasone has gained a major role in the therapeutic algorithm of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen or on mechanical ventilation. Its wide anti-inflammatory action seems to form the basis for its beneficial action, taming the overwhelming cytokine storm. Amid a plethora of scientific research on therapeutic options for COVID-19, there are still unanswered questions about the right timing, right dosing, and right duration of the corticosteroid treatment. The aim of this review article was to summarize the data on the dexamethasone treatment in COVID-19 and outline the clinical considerations of corticosteroid therapy in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据