4.7 Article

Regiodivergent and stereoselective hydroxyazidation of alkenes by biocatalytic cascades

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102883

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31800663, 21961048]
  2. Guizhou Science and Technology Department [QKHZC-2019-2579, QKHJC-2019-1467]
  3. National First-Rate Construction Discipline of Guizhou Province (Pharmacy) [YLXKJS-YX-04]
  4. Science and Technology Department of Zunyi [ZSKRPT-2020-5]
  5. Program for Outstanding Youth of Zunyi Medical University [17zy-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dual-enzyme cascade strategy was developed for regiodivergent and stereoselective hydroxyazidation of alkenes, leading to the synthesis of various enantiomerically pure 1,2-azidoalcohols. This approach combines the asymmetric epoxidation of alkenes and regio-selective ring opening of epoxides with azide catalyzed by styrene monooxygenase and halohydrin dehalogenase. Additionally, a one-pot chemo-enzymatic route to chiral beta-hydroxytriazoles from alkenes was achieved by combining biocatalytic cascades and Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition.
Asymmetric functionalization of alkenes allows the direct synthesis of a wide range of chiral compounds. Vicinal hydroxyazidation of alkenes provides a desirable path to 1,2-azidoalcohols; however, existing methods are limited by the control of stereoselectivity and regioselectivity. Herein, we describe a dual-enzyme cascade strategy for regiodivergent and stereoselective hydroxyazidation of alkenes, affording various enantiomerically pure 1,2-azidoalcohols. The biocatalytic cascade process is designed by combining styrene monooxygenase-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation of alkenes and halohydrin dehalogenase-catalyzed regio-selective ring opening of epoxides with azide. Additionally, a one-pot chemo-enzymatic route to chiral beta-hydroxytriazoles from alkenes is developed via combining the biocatalytic cascades and Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据