4.7 Review

Comprehensive strategies of machine-learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship models

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103052

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773196, 32070681]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Special Projects [2020KZDZX1182]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Funds [2019B030301001, 2017B030301018]
  4. Shenzhen Research Funds [JCYJ20170817104740861]
  5. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053117035204]
  6. Center for Computational Science and Engineering of Southern University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the integration of wet experiments, molecular dynamics simulation, and machine learning techniques to improve QSAR models, proposing a new iterative framework. It also explores the application of QSAR and machine learning in drug development and clinical trials.
Early quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) technologies have unsatisfactory versatility and accuracy in fields such as drug discovery because they are based on traditional machine learning and interpretive expert features. The development of Big Data and deep learning technologies significantly improve the processing of unstructured data and unleash the great potential of QSAR. Here we discuss the integration of wet experiments (which provide experimental data and reliable verification), molecular dynamics simulation (which provides mechanistic interpretation at the atomic/molecular levels), and machine learning (including deep learning) techniques to improve QSAR models. We first review the history of traditional QSAR and point out its problems. We then propose a better QSAR model characterized by a new iterative framework to integrate machine learning with disparate data input. Finally, we discuss the application of QSAR and machine learning to many practical research fields, including drug development and clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据