4.7 Article

Development of a gene-deleted live attenuated candidate vaccine against fish virus (ISKNV) with low pathogenicity and high protection

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102750

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0900504, 2018YFD0900501]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201904020043, 201607020014]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31702381]
  4. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-46]
  5. Guangdong Key Research and Development Program [2019B020217001]
  6. Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a gene-deleted live attenuated candidate vaccine against ISKNV, which showed low pathogenicity and high protection in experimental studies, indicating potential benefits for controlling fish diseases.
Aquaculture provides important food, nutrition, and income sources for humans. However, aquaculture industry is seriously threatened by viral diseases. Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) disease causes high mortality and economic losses to the fish culture industry in Asia and has been listed as a certifiable disease by the International Epizootic Office. Vaccine development is urgent to control this disease. Here, a gene-deleted live attenuated candidate vaccine (Delta ORF022L) against ISKNV with low pathogenicity and high protection was developed. Delta ORF022L replicated well inmandarin fish fry-1 cells and showed similar structure with wild-type ISKNV. However, the pathogenicity was significantly lower as 98% of the mandarin fish infected with Delta ORF022L survived, whereas all those infected with wild-type ISKNV died. Of importance, 100% of the Delta ORF022L-infected fish survived the ISKNV challenge. Delta ORF022L induced anti-ISKNV specific antibody response and upregulation of immune-related genes. This work could be beneficial to the control of fish diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据