4.7 Article

CD177, a specific marker of neutrophil activation, is associated with coronavirus disease 2019 severity and death

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102711

关键词

-

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. Investissements d'Avenir program
  3. Vaccine Research Institute (VRI) [ANR-10-LABX-77-01]
  4. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) [101005077]
  5. European Union
  6. EFPIA
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  8. Global Health Drug Discovery Institute, University of Dundee
  9. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and Ministry of Higher Education and Research dedicated COVID19 fund and PHRC [20-0424]
  10. REACTing consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study identified abnormalities in neutrophil activation in severe COVID-19 patients, with CD177 serving as a reliable prognostic marker to distinguish between patients with the worst prognosis leading to death and those who recovered.
The identification of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and high risk of severe disease is a challenge in routine care. We performed cell phenotypic, serum, and RNA sequencing gene expression analyses in severe hospitalized patients (n = 61). Relative to healthy donors, results showed abnormalities of 27 cell populations and an elevation of 42 cytokines, neutrophil chemo-attractants, and inflammatory components in patients. Supervised and unsupervised analyses revealed a high abundance of CD177, a specific neutrophil activation marker, contributing to the clustering of severe patients. Gene abundance correlated with high serum levels of CD177 in severe patients. Higher levels were confirmed in a second cohort and in intensive care unit (ICU) than non-ICU patients (P < 0.001). Longitudinal measurements discriminated between patients with the worst prognosis, leading to death, and those who recovered (P = 0.01). These results highlight neutrophil activation as a hallmark of severe disease and CD177 assessment as a reliable prognostic marker for routine care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据