4.7 Article

Medium-chain triglycerides inhibit long-chain triglyceride-induced GIP secretion through GPR120-dependent inhibition of CCK

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102963

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19K09022]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour andWelfare
  4. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
  5. Japan Diabetes Foundation
  6. Japan Association for Diabetes Education and Care
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) Life Science Foundation
  8. Public Interest Incorporated Foundation
  9. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K09022] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that medium-chain triglycerides inhibit excessive secretion of GIP from enteroendocrine K cells, leading to reduced obesity and insulin resistance under high long-chain triglyceride diet conditions.
Long-chain triglycerides (LCTs) intake strongly stimulates GIP secretion from enteroendocrine K cells and induces obesity and insulin resistance partly due to GIP hypersecretion. In this study, we found that medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) inhibit GIP secretion after single LCT ingestion and clarified the mechanism underlying MCT-induced inhibition of GIP secretion. MCTs reduced the CCK effect after single LCT ingestion in wild-type ( WT) mice, and a CCK agonist completely reversed MCT-induced inhibition of GIP secretion. In vitro studies showed that medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) inhibit long-chain fatty acid (LCFA)-stimulated CCK secretion and increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations through inhibition of GPR120 signaling. Long-term administration of MCTs reduced obesity and insulin resistance in high-LCT diet-fed WT mice, but not in high-LCT diet-fed GIP-knockout mice. Thus, MCT-induced inhibition of GIP hypersecretion reduces obesity and insulin resistance under high-LCT diet feeding condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据