4.7 Article

Simple and Convenient Interface Modification by Nanosized Diamond for Carbon Based All-Inorganic CsPbIBr2 Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 5661-5667

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00457

关键词

nanodiamond; interface modification; light scattering; carbon based; CsPbIBr2 solar cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62004151, 61804113, 61874083]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020T130490]
  3. Initiative Postdocs Supporting Program of China [BX20190261, 2019M663628]
  4. Joint Research Funds of Department of Science & Technology of Shaanxi Province
  5. Northwestern Polytechnical University [2020GXLH-Z-014]
  6. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2021JC-24, 2021JM-138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The simple and convenient interface modification using nanosized diamond significantly improved the performance of carbon based all-inorganic CsPbIBr2 planar perovskite solar cells, mainly by enhancing light absorption and reducing carrier recombination.
In this work, a simple and convenient interface modification by nanosized diamond (ND) was used in the carbon based all-inorganic CsPbIBr2 planar perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Only by spin-coating ND particles on the crystallized perovskite without further treatment did all CsPbIBr2 PSCs achieve an overall improvement in photovoltaic performance. The champion PCE of ND modified PSC reached 9.07%, 22% higher than the control device (7.46%), and remained at 86% of its original value after 50 days. Particularly, the device obtained a V-OC beyond 1.30 V and FF over 60% at the same time, which is superior to most of the reported CsPbIBr2 PSCs. The results of light absorption, PL spectra, TPC, TPV, and electrochemical analysis revealed that the superior device performance mainly came from the improved light absorption and reduced carrier recombination in PSCs. Therefore, the ND provides a facile strategy to enhance the performance of CsPbIBr2 PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据