4.6 Article

Transcriptional Responses of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum to the Infection by SsHADV-1

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof7070493

关键词

transcriptome; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hypovirulence associated DNA virus 1; mycoviruses

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2017YFD0200600]
  2. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed that infection by SsHADV-1 caused differential expression of 3110 genes in S. sclerotiorum, with 1741 up-regulated and 1369 down-regulated. Pathways such as DNA replication, DNA damage response, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, ribosomal assembly, and translation were affected upon infection. Furthermore, SsHADV-1 infection suppressed the expression of antiviral RNA silencing and virulence factor genes.
The infection by a single-stranded DNA virus, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hypovirulence-associated DNA virus 1 (SsHADV-1), causes hypovirulence, a reduced growth rate, and other colony morphological changes in its host Sclerotinia sclerotiorum strain DT-8. However, the mechanisms of the decline are still unclear. Using digital RNA sequencing, a transcriptome analysis was conducted to elucidate the phenotype-related genes with expression changes in response to SsHADV-1 infection. A total of 3110 S. sclerotiorum differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected during SsHADV-1 infection, 1741 of which were up-regulated, and 1369 were down-regulated. The identified DEGs were involved in several important pathways. DNA replication, DNA damage response, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, ribosomal assembly, and translation were the affected categories in S. sclerotiorum upon SsHADV-1 infection. Moreover, the infection of SsHADV-1 also suppressed the expression of antiviral RNA silencing and virulence factor genes. These results provide further detailed insights into the effects of SsHADV-1 infection on the whole genome transcription in S. sclerotiorum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据