4.7 Article

Local Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9060585

关键词

biomodel; stroke; hemorrhage; neurology; rats; behavior

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-76-10034]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-76-10034] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted a comprehensive short-term study on the development of cerebrovascular disorders in rats with an intracerebral hematoma model. The overall lethality of the model was 43.7% and it reflects the main diagnostic criteria for acute disorders of cerebral circulation.
(1) Background: Hemorrhagic stroke is a lethal disease, accounting for 15% of all stroke cases. However, there are very few models of stroke with a hemorrhagic etiology. Research work is devoted to studying the development of cerebrovascular disorders in rats with an intracerebral hematoma model. The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive short-term study, including neurological tests, biochemical blood tests, and histomorphological studies of brain structures. (2) Methods: The model was reproduced surgically by traumatizing the brain in the capsula interna area and then injecting autologous blood. Neurological deficit was assessed according to the McGrow stroke-index scale, motor activity, orientation-exploratory behavior, emotionality, and motor functions. On Day 15, after the operation, hematological and biochemical blood tests as well as histological studies of the brain were performed. (3) Results: The overall lethality of the model was 43.7%. Acute intracerebral hematoma in rats causes marked disorders of motor activity and functional impairment, as well as inflammatory processes in the nervous tissue, which persist for at least 14 days. (4) Conclusions: This model reflects the situation observed in the clinic and reproduces the main diagnostic criteria for acute disorders of cerebral circulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据