4.7 Article

The Effects of Obesity on Lymphatic Pain and Swelling in Breast Cancer Patients

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9070818

关键词

obesity; lymphatic; pain; swelling; arm swelling; truncal swelling; lymphedema; breast cancer

资金

  1. National Institute of Health/National Science Foundation/National Cancer Institute [1R01CA214085-01]
  2. Judges and Lawyers for Breast Cancer Alert

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity has a significant impact on lymphatic pain and arm swelling in breast cancer patients, with the greatest effects seen on lymphatic pain and arm swelling. Further research is needed to explore inflammatory pathways and molecular mechanisms for potential treatments.
Background Lymphatic pain and swelling due to lymph fluid accumulation are the most common and debilitating long-term adverse effects of cancer treatment. This study aimed to quantify the effects of obesity on lymphatic pain, arm, and truncal swelling. Methods: A sample of 554 breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and body fat mass were measured using a bioimpedance device. Obesity was defined as a BMI >= 30 kg/m(2). The Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index was used to measure lymphatic pain, arm, and truncal swelling. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to quantify the effects of obesity. Results: Controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics as well as body fat percentage, obesity had the greatest effects on lymphatic pain (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.87-6.50; p < 0.001) and arm swelling (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.82-4.43; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Obesity is a significant risk factor for lymphatic pain and arm swelling in breast cancer patients. Obesity, lymphatic pain, and swelling are inflammatory conditions. Future study should explore the inflammatory pathways and understand the molecular mechanisms to find a cure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据