4.3 Article

Morphogenesis, biomass and nutritive value of Panicum maximum under different shade levels and fertilizer nitrogen rates

期刊

GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 590-600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12264

关键词

chemical composition; fertilization; forage production; silvopastoral systems; shading; tiller population density

类别

资金

  1. Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Panicum maximum is important for cattle production in tropical regions, and it responds well to nitrogen (N) fertilization. Many cultivars have exhibited potential for use in silvopastoral systems, although there is limited information on how different levels of N can influence plant growth and nutritive value under shading. Morphogenetic and structural traits, biomass production and nutritive value of two P. maximum cultivars (Tanzania and Massai) were investigated under three shading levels (0, 37 and 58%) and four N rates (0, 50, 100 and 150 mg N dm(-3)). Plants were grown in pots under shade. Leaf and stem elongation rate and leaf blade length increased with shading and in response to N. Tiller density was reduced with shading, but showed a linear increase fashion with N under full sun and moderate shading. Under intense shading, the tillering showed a quadratic response to N. Plant biomass production increased linearly with N under full sun and moderate shade, but it increased quadratically under intense shade. Crude protein (CP) content increased with shade and N and was greater for Tanzania than Massai under shade. Contents of NDF and ADF were greater for Massai than Tanzania. Acid detergent insoluble protein was reduced in Tanzania under shade, but it increased for Massai. It is suggested that the positive shading effect on CP content may not result in increased nutritional value. Although N fertilization was important for increasing biomass production under full sun and moderate shade, it should be avoided under intense shading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据