4.7 Article

Steps per Day and All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged Adults in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study

期刊

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24516

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. University of Alabama at Birmingham [HHSN268201800005I, HHSN268201800007I]
  3. Northwestern University [HHSN268201800003I]
  4. University of Minnesota [HHSN268201800006I]
  5. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute [HHSN268201800004I]
  6. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  7. NIA [AG0005]
  8. NHLBI [AG0005]
  9. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL078972]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among Black and White men and women in middle adulthood, participants who took approximately 7000 steps per day or more experienced lower mortality rates compared with those taking fewer than 7000 steps per day. There was no association between step intensity and mortality.
IMPORTANCE Steps per day is a meaningful metric for physical activity promotion in clinical and population settings. To guide promotion strategies of step goals, it is important to understand the association of steps with clinical end points, including mortality. OBJECTIVE To estimate the association of steps per day with premature (age 41-65 years) all-cause mortality among Black and White men and women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study was part of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Participants were aged 38 to 50 years and wore an accelerometer from 2005 to 2006. Participantswere followed for a mean (SD) of 10.8 (0.9) years. Data were analyzed in 2020 and 2021. EXPOSURE Daily steps volume, classified as low (<7000 steps/d), moderate (7000-9999 steps/d), and high (>= 10 000 steps/d) and stepping intensity, classified as peak 30-minute stepping rate and time spent at 100 steps/min or more. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES All-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 2110 participants from the CARDIA study were included, with a mean (SD) age of 45.2 (3.6) years, 1205 (57.1%) women, 888 (42.1%) Black participants, and a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 9146 (7307-11 162) steps/d. During 22 845 person years of follow-up, 72 participants (3.4%) died. Using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, compared with participants in the low step group, there was significantly lower risk of mortality in the moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.15-0.54]; risk difference [RD], 53 [95% CI, 27-78] events per 1000 people) and high (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.81]; RD, 41 [95% CI, 15-68] events per 1000 people) step groups. Compared with the low step group, moderate/high step rate was associated with reduced risk of mortality in Black participants (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.63]) and in White participants (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17-0.81]). Similarly, compared with the low step group, moderate/ high step rate was associated with reduce risk of mortality in women (HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.12-0.63]) and men (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.88]). There was no significant association between peak 30-minute intensity (lowest vs highest tertile: HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.54-1.77]) or time at 100 steps/min or more (lowest vs highest tertile: HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.73-2.61]) with risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that among Black and White men and women in middle adulthood, participants who took approximately 7000 steps/d or more experienced lower mortality rates compared with participants taking fewer than 7000 steps/d. There was no association of step intensity with mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据