期刊
JAMA NETWORK OPEN
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 -出版社
AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18467
关键词
-
资金
- Duke National University of Singapore Medical School [Duke-NUS-KP(Coll)/2018/0011B]
- Estate of Tan Sri Khoo Teck Puat under the Khoo Pilot Award
- Singapore National Medical Research Council under the PULSES Center Grant [CGDec19F04]
This cohort study developed an interpretable machine learning tool to estimate mortality risk in individuals admitted to the hospital from the emergency department. The tool, named Score for Emergency Risk Prediction, showed promise in accurately identifying patients at risk of death within 2, 7, or 30 days of admission. The machine learning tool outperformed several benchmark clinical scores, indicating its potential for widespread application and validation in different healthcare settings.
This cohort study examines the performance of an interpretable machine learning triage tool in estimating mortality in individuals admitted to the hospital from the emergency department. Question How does an interpretable machine learning triage tool for estimating mortality perform in a cohort of individuals admitted to the hospital from the emergency department compared with other clinical scores? Findings In this cohort study, the parsimonious and point-based Score for Emergency Risk Prediction was more accurate in identifying patients who died within 2, 7, or 30 days of admissions than other point-based clinical scores. Meaning These results suggest that the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction tool shows promise for triaging patients admitted from the emergency department according to mortality risk. IMPORTANCE Triage in the emergency department (ED) is a complex clinical judgment based on the tacit understanding of the patient's likelihood of survival, availability of medical resources, and local practices. Although a scoring tool could be valuable in risk stratification, currently available scores have demonstrated limitations. OBJECTIVES To develop an interpretable machine learning tool based on a parsimonious list of variables available at ED triage; provide a simple, early, and accurate estimate of patients' risk of death; and evaluate the tool's predictive accuracy compared with several established clinical scores. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-site, retrospective cohort study assessed all ED patients between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016, who were subsequently admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore. The Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) tool was derived using a machine learning framework. To estimate mortality outcomes after emergency admissions, SERP was compared with several triage systems, including Patient Acuity Category Scale, Modified Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score, Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage, Rapid Acute Physiology Score, and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score. The initial analyses were completed in October 2020, and additional analyses were conducted in May 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Three SERP scores, namely SERP-2d, SERP-7d, and SERP-30d, were developed using the primary outcomes of interest of 2-, 7-, and 30-day mortality, respectively. Secondary outcomes included 3-day mortality and inpatient mortality. The SERP's predictive power was measured using the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS The study included 224 666 ED episodes in the model training cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 63.60 [16.90] years; 113 426 [50.5%] female), 56 167 episodes in the validation cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 63.58 [16.87] years; 28 427 [50.6%] female), and 42 676 episodes in the testing cohort (mean [SD] patient age, 64.85 [16.80] years; 21 556 [50.5%] female). The mortality rates in the training cohort were 0.8% at 2 days, 2.2% at 7 days, and 5.9% at 30 days. In the testing cohort, the areas under the curve of SERP-30d were 0.821 (95% CI, 0.796-0.847) for 2-day mortality, 0.826 (95% CI, 0.811-0.841) for 7-day mortality, and 0.823 (95% CI, 0.814-0.832) for 30-day mortality and outperformed several benchmark scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this retrospective cohort study, SERP had better prediction performance than existing triage scores while maintaining easy implementation and ease of ascertainment in the ED. It has the potential to be widely applied and validated in different circumstances and health care settings.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据