4.5 Article

Late time physics of holographic quantum chaos

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.2.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique (Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung) [2000 20_ 182513]
  2. NCCR [51NF40-141869]
  3. DFG Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 183 Project [277101999]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the relationship between quantum chaotic systems and random matrix theory, describing an effective field theory description derived from a simple symmetry-breaking principle and Goldstone modes. It also discusses a general framework within AdS/CFT for expressing correlations between different universes.
Quantum chaotic systems are often defined via the assertion that their spectral statistics coincides with, or is well approximated by, random matrix theory. In this paper we explain how the universal content of random matrix theory emerges as the consequence of a simple symmetry-breaking principle and its associated Goldstone modes. This allows us to write down an effective-field theory (EFT) description of quantum chaotic systems, which is able to control the level statistics up to an accuracy O(e(-S)) with S the entropy. We explain how the EFT description emerges from explicit ensembles, using the example of a matrix model with arbitrary invariant potential, but also when and how it applies to individual quantum systems, without reference to an ensemble. Within AdS/CFT this gives a general framework to express correlations between different universes and we explicitly demonstrate the bulk realization of the EFT in minimal string theory where the Goldstone modes are bound states of strings stretching between bulk spectral branes. We discuss the construction of the EFT of quantum chaos also in higher dimensional field theories, as applicable for example for higher-dimensional AdS/CFT dual pairs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据