4.5 Article

Effective field theory for hydrodynamics without boosts

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.3.054

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Dutch Institute for Emergent Phenomena (DIEP) cluster at the University of Amsterdam
  3. NSERC Discovery Grant program of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research presents the formulation of the Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of hydrodynamics without boost symmetry and explores various transport coefficients and fluctuation modes. The new hydrodynamic framework provides a unified stable approach for studying different types of fluids.
We formulate the Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory of hydrodynamics without boost symmetry. This includes a spacetime covariant formulation of classical hydrodynamics without boosts with an additional conserved particle/charge current coupled to Aristotelian background sources. We find that, up to first order in derivatives, the theory is characterised by the thermodynamic equation of state and a total of 29 independent transport coefficients, in particular, 3 hydrostatic, 9 non-hydrostatic non-dissipative, and 17 dissipative. Furthermore, we study the spectrum of linearised fluctuations around anisotropic equilibrium states with non-vanishing fluid velocity. This analysis reveals a pair of sound modes that propagate at different speeds along and opposite to the fluid flow, one charge diffusion mode, and two distinct shear modes along and perpendicular to the fluid velocity. We present these results in a new hydrodynamic frame that is linearly stable irrespective of the boost symmetry in place. This provides a unified covariant stable approach for simultaneously treating Lorentzian, Galilean, and Lifshitz fluids within an effective field theory framework and sets the stage for future studies of non-relativistic intertwined patterns of symmetry breaking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据