4.5 Article

On exotic consistent anomalies in (1+1)d: A ghost story

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.5.119

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sherman Fairchild Foundation
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DESC0011632]
  3. Simons Collaboration Grant on the NonPerturbative Bootstrap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revisits 't Hooft anomalies in (1+1)d non-spin quantum field theory, revealing that certain exotic anomalies can only be realized by non-reflection-positive or non-compact theories. The inflow mechanism for the mixed U(1) gravitational anomaly is proposed, leading to an isotopy anomaly of U(1) topological defect lines. The isotopy anomaly can be canceled by an extrinsic curvature improvement term, but at the cost of creating a periodicity anomaly.
We revisit 't Hooft anomalies in (1+1)d non-spin quantum field theory, starting from the consistency and locality conditions, and find that consistent U(1) and gravitational anomalies cannot always be canceled by properly quantized (2+1)d classical Chern-Simons actions. On the one hand, we prove that certain exotic anomalies can only be realized by non-reflection-positive or non-compact theories; on the other hand, without insisting on reflection-positivity, the exotic anomalies present a caveat to the inflow paradigm. For the mixed U(1) gravitational anomaly, we propose an inflow mechanism involving a mixed U(1) x SO(2) classical Chern-Simons action with a boundary condition that matches the SO(2) gauge field with the (1+1)d spin connection. Furthermore, we show that this mixed anomaly gives rise to an isotopy anomaly of U(1) topological defect lines. The isotopy anomaly can be canceled by an extrinsic curvature improvement term, but at the cost of creating a periodicity anomaly. We survey the holomorphic be ghost system which realizes all the exotic consistent anomalies, and end with comments on a subtlety regarding the anomalies of finite subgroups of U(1). Copyright C. Chang and Y. Lin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据