4.6 Article

The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in breast cancer

期刊

NPJ BREAST CANCER
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00283-z

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Northern Ireland Biobank
  2. HSC Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency in Northern Ireland
  3. Friends of the Cancer Centre
  4. Academy of Medical Sciences
  5. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  6. Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology
  7. CRUK Accelerator [C11512/A20256]
  8. NVIDIA Corporation via the GPU Grant Program
  9. British Research Council
  10. Breast Cancer Now Scientific Fellowship [2012MaySF122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a new method to assess STING activation in tumor cells, showing that pnSTING expression is associated with good prognosis in ER+ breast cancer but not in ER- disease. Additionally, low pnSTING is linked to chromosomal instability, MYC amplification, and mTOR signaling.
STING signaling in cancer is a crucial component of response to immunotherapy and other anti-cancer treatments. Currently, there is no robust method of measuring STING activation in cancer. Here, we describe an immunohistochemistry-based assay with digital pathology assessment of STING in tumor cells. Using this novel approach in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER- breast cancer, we identify perinuclear-localized expression of STING (pnSTING) in ER+ cases as an independent predictor of good prognosis, associated with immune cell infiltration and upregulation of immune checkpoints. Tumors with low pnSTING are immunosuppressed with increased infiltration of M2-polarized macrophages. In ER- disease, pnSTING does not appear to have a significant prognostic role with STING uncoupled from interferon responses. Importantly, a gene signature defining low pnSTING expression is predictive of poor prognosis in independent ER+ datasets. Low pnSTING is associated with chromosomal instability, MYC amplification and mTOR signaling, suggesting novel therapeutic approaches for this subgroup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据