4.7 Article

True Cost of Solar Hydrogen

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100487

关键词

green hydrogen; levelized cost of electricity; levelized cost of hydrogen; solar photovoltaics

资金

  1. European Union [825669]
  2. European Commission -Joint Research Centre (JRC)
  3. Ispra, Italy
  4. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [825669] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green hydrogen will be a crucial component of the future 100% sustainable energy and industrial system, with a certain proportion of solar and wind electricity being used for hydrogen production through water electrolysis. It is anticipated that by 2030 and 2050, electrolyzer capital expenditure and hydrogen costs will significantly decrease, particularly with the continuous decline in solar PV costs.
Green hydrogen will be an essential part of the future 100% sustainable energy and industry system. Up to one-third of the required solar and wind electricity would eventually be used for water electrolysis to produce hydrogen, increasing the cumulative electrolyzer capacity to about 17 TWel by 2050. The key method applied in this research is a learning curve approach for the key technologies, i.e., solar photovoltaics (PV) and water electrolyzers, and levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH). Sensitivities for the hydrogen demand and various input parameters are considered. Electrolyzer capital expenditure (CAPEX) for a large utility-scale system is expected to decrease from the current 400 euro/kW(el) to 240 euro/kW(el) by 2030 and to 80 euro/kW(el) by 2050. With the continuing solar PV cost decrease, this will lead to an LCOH decrease from the current 31-81 euro/MWh(H2,LHV) (1.0-2.7 euro/kg(H2)) to 20-54 euro/MWh(H2,LHV) (0.7-1.8 euro/kg(H2)) by 2030 and 10-27 euro/MWh(H2,LHV) (0.3-0.9 euro/kg(H2)) by 2050, depending on the location. The share of PV electricity cost in the LCOH will increase from the current 63% to 74% by 2050.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据