4.7 Article

Solar-Enhanced CO2 Conversion with CH4 over Synergetic NiCo Alloy Catalysts with Light-to-Fuel Efficiency of 33.8%

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100185

关键词

CO2 reduction; dry reforming of methane; NiCo alloy; solar fuels; synergistic catalysis

资金

  1. Basic Science Center Program for Ordered Energy Conversion of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51888103]
  2. Basic Research Program of Frontier Leading Technologies in Jiangsu Province [BK20202008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of NiCo alloy catalyst enables efficient solar-driven CO2 conversion with high light-to-fuel efficiency, attributing to photo-enhanced reactant activation and synergistic catalysis to inhibit carbon formation.
Conversion of CO2 into useful chemical feedstocks or fuels using solar energy is a promising technology to tackle both climate change and energy shortage challenges. Here, NiCo alloys derived from AlMg hydrotalcite are introduced for photothermal synergetic CO2 conversion with CH4 with an ultrahigh light-to-fuel efficiency of 33.8% and a low carbon deposition rate of 0.011 g(c) g(cat)(-1)h(-1). The ultrahigh efficiency is attributed to the high solar absorptance of NiCo alloys, unique synergistic catalysis of NiCo active sites, and the photo-enhanced reactant activation. Inhibition of carbon formation lies in concurrent reduced energy barriers of CH* oxidation to CHO* and increased energy barriers of CH* dissociation to C*, enabled by the unique synergistic catalysis of NiCo alloys. Direct light illumination results in an obvious decrease of the apparent activation energy of CO2 conversion with CH4, making light-driven CO2 conversion superior to conventional thermal-driven techniques. Herein, a new platform for achieving efficient solar-driven CO2 conversion with ultrahigh light-to-fuel efficiency based on NiCo alloy catalyst is provided and the way for sclable deployment of photothermal CO2-to-fuel techniques is paved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据