4.8 Article

Giant refrigerant capacity in Gd-based amorphous/nanocrsytalline composite fibers

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100528

关键词

Magnetocaloric effect; Metallic glass; Nanocrystalline alloy; Composite; Fiber

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0703602, 2018YFA0703604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51771217, 51827801, 51922102]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2019296]
  4. Ningbo Science and Technology Innovation 2025 Project [2019B10051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed amorphous/nanocrystalline composite fibers with a huge refrigerant capacity, which can be used for magnetic refrigeration across a wide temperature range, providing a new approach to the research of refrigeration magnetic materials.
Magnetic refrigeration attracts increasing interests for its superior efficiency and eco-friendliness. The crystalline magnetocaloric materials usually exhibit large entropy change (Delta S-M) but narrow working temperature range, while the amorphous magnetocaloric materials usually exhibit broad working temperature range but skimpy Delta S-M at low temperatures. Herein, we designed Gd90-xNixAl10 (x = 5-15) amorphous/nanocrystalline composite fibers (ANCF) using melt extraction method in order to combine the advantages of amorphous and crystalline magnetocaloric materials. The Gd-based ANCF exhibits a giant refrigerant capacity (RC, 985 J kg(-1) for Gd80Ni10Al10) across a wide temperature range from 70 K to 270 K that is much larger than the known magnetocaloric materials. This superior property is attributed to the ideal coupling between amorphous phase and crystalline Gd & [GdNi] phases that distribute homogeneously. This work provides not only promising refrigeration magnetic materials but also a general scaleable method for fabricating at the temperature range from room temperature to liquid nitrogen temperatures. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据