4.8 Review

Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: From mechanistic understanding to reactor design

期刊

JOULE
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 1704-1731

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rice University
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-2051-20200401]
  3. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2020-71371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes critical mechanisms that could influence the stability of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and discusses the importance of stability in large-scale electrolysis industrialization. Additionally, it provides catalyst and reactor design principles for overcoming OER stability challenges.
The electrochemical synthesis of chemicals and fuel feedstocks has been demonstrated to be a sustainable and green alternative to traditional chemical engineering, where oxygen evolution reaction (OER) plays a vital role in coupling with various cathodic reactions . While tremendous attention, involving both research and review topics, has been focused on pushing the limit of OER catalysts' activity, the long-term stability of OER catalysts, which may play an even more important role in large-scale electrolysis industrialization, has been much less emphasized. Until this point, few systematic strategies for developing OER catalysts with industrially relevant durability have been reported. In this review, critical mechanisms that could influence OER stability are summarized, including surface reconstruction, lattice oxygen evolution, and the dissolution-redeposition process of catalysts. Moreover, to bridge the gap between lab-scale OER tests and large-scale electrocatalysis applications, stability considerations in electrolyzer design for long-term operation are also discussed in detail. This review provides catalyst and reactor design principles for overcoming OER stability challenges and will focus more attention from the field on the great importance of OER stability as well as future large-scale electrocatalysis applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据