4.6 Article

Interplay of electrochemical and electrical effects induces structural transformations in electrocatalysts

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 479-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-021-00624-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. University of Waterloo
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leaders Fund [38060]
  5. Ontario Research Fund: Small Infrastructure
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. California State University Long Beach
  8. Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates how electrochemical and complex current behaviors influence the structural stability of nanoscale objects during electrocatalysis.
The precise control of nanostructure and surface atomic arrangement can be used to tune the electrocatalytic properties of materials and improve their performance. Unfortunately, the long-term structural stability of electrocatalysts with complex nanoscale morphology, a necessary requirement for industrial implementation, often remains elusive. Here we study how electrochemical and complex current behaviours affect the nanoscale object and its structural stability during electrocatalysis. We find that metal electromigration can drive structural transformation during electrolysis to minimize current crowding in nanoscale geometric constrictions. This electrical phenomenon, acting in combination with electrochemically induced atomic migration, can result in specific structural transformations of the catalyst, with the extent and rate depending on the material, geometry and reaction. Using a series of nanostructure examples, we establish a general framework for evaluating the structural transformations in cathodic metal nanocatalysts and explain specific qualitative trends. In conjunction with catalyst design rules, this mechanistic framework will facilitate the development of nanostructured electrocatalysts with sufficient stability for sustainable applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据