4.7 Article

A ResNet50-Based Method for Classifying Surface Defects in Hot-Rolled Strip Steel

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 9, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9192359

关键词

hot rolled strip steel; deep learning; surface defects; defect classification

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [61573087, 61573088, 62173072, 62173073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a deep learning model for strip steel defect classification, achieving a high classification accuracy by introducing FcaNet and CBAM technologies. Additionally, through ensemble learning optimization, the recognition rate of oxide scale defects and overall defect classification accuracy were significantly improved.
Hot-rolled strip steel is widely used in automotive manufacturing, chemical and home appliance industries, and its surface quality has a great impact on the quality of the final product. In the manufacturing process of strip steel, due to the rolling process and many other reasons, the surface of hot rolled strip steel will inevitably produce slag, scratches and other surface defects. These defects not only affect the quality of the product, but may even lead to broken strips in the subsequent process, seriously affecting the continuation of production. Therefore, it is important to study the surface defects of strip steel and identify the types of defects in strip steel. In this paper, a scheme based on ResNet50 with the addition of FcaNet and Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) is proposed for strip defect classification and validated on the X-SDD strip defect dataset. Our solution achieves a classification accuracy of 94.11%, higher than more than a dozen other compared deep learning models. Moreover, to adress the problem of low accuracy of the algorithm in classifying individual defects, we use ensemble learning to optimize. By integrating the original solution with VGG16 and SqueezeNet, the recognition rate of oxide scale of plate system defects improved by 21.05 percentage points, and the overall defect classification accuracy improved to 94.85%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据