4.7 Article

An Improved High-Dimensional Kriging Surrogate Modeling Method through Principal Component Dimension Reduction

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 9, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9161985

关键词

surrogate model; Kriging; high-dimensional problems; principal component dimension reduction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775472]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [21HASTIT027]
  3. Henan Excellent Youth Fund Project [202300410346]
  4. Training plan of Young Backbone Teachers in Universities of Henan Province [2020GGJS209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed high-dimensional Kriging modeling method through principal component dimension reduction (HDKM-PCDR) can achieve faster modeling efficiency while reducing time consumption.
The Kriging surrogate model in complex simulation problems uses as few expensive objectives as possible to establish a global or local approximate interpolation. However, due to the inversion of the covariance correlation matrix and the solving of Kriging-related parameters, the Kriging approximation process for high-dimensional problems is time consuming and even impossible to construct. For this reason, a high-dimensional Kriging modeling method through principal component dimension reduction (HDKM-PCDR) is proposed by considering the correlation parameters and the design variables of a Kriging model. It uses PCDR to transform a high-dimensional correlation parameter vector in Kriging into low-dimensional one, which is used to reconstruct a new correlation function. In this way, time consumption of correlation parameter optimization and correlation function matrix construction in the Kriging modeling process is greatly reduced. Compared with the original Kriging method and the high-dimensional Kriging modeling method based on partial least squares, the proposed method can achieve faster modeling efficiency under the premise of meeting certain accuracy requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据